Tools

Move beyond hype cycles to address the fundamental economics of deployment. Use our tools as an analytical backbone for the modern AI decision-making process

In an ecosystem defined by rapid model proliferation and opaque cost structures, strategic clarity requires more than qualitative assessment; it demands rigorous, quantitative validation.

As utilization rates climb, the economic gravity shifts from public cloud flexibility to on-premise efficiency. PMO1 TCO Calculator dissects the multi-variable cost equation – integrating variables like TDP, colocation density, and silicon amortization – to identify the precise breakeven horizon where repatriating workloads yields superior unit economics.

On Premise vs Cloud TCO Calculator

AI API Pricing Calculator

The “API Pricing Calculator” navigates the fragmented landscape of model inference costs. By normalizing pricing across token windows, context lengths, and provider tiers (from proprietary frontiers to open-weights hosted solutions), we enable you to optimize their “price-to-intelligence” ratio for high-volume applications.

Go beyond the vendor-supplied theoretical TOPS and other marketing materials. Leveraging the latest MLPerf ® v5.1 data, our inference benchmarks help you visualize effective throughput and latency under real-world constraints. (Note: “The MLPerf™ name and logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of MLCommons Association in the United States and other countries.)

Inference Benchmarks

General Disclaimer: The calculators, benchmarks, and financial models presented on this page—including the TCO Comparison, API Pricing Engine, and Inference Performance Benchmarks – are provided exclusively for estimation and strategic planning purposes. All outputs are derived from aggregated channel pricing, public cloud rate cards, and standardized performance metrics (e.g., MLPerf ®). Please note that actual Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and system performance are highly variable and dependent on negotiated enterprise agreements, volume discounts, regional energy costs, and specific architectural implementations. While PMO1 exercises rigorous diligence in data curation, we make no representations or warranties regarding the absolute accuracy or currency of the information provided. PMO1 disclaims all liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages arising from the use of or reliance on these tools. All financial and architectural decisions should be independently verified with respective vendors prior to execution.

FAQs

How does the TCO Calculator account for the hidden costs of on-premise deployment? arrow faq
Beyond the sticker price of the hardware, our model integrates a comprehensive "Day 2" operational framework. This includes variable electricity costs based on TDP, cooling overhead specific to air or liquid-cooled architectures, and high-density colocation fees. We also factor in an annual maintenance burden to cover vendor support and component replacement, ensuring the comparison against "all-inclusive" cloud rates is rigorous and fair..
Why do the breakeven points for inference-optimized systems differ from training clusters? arrow faq
Inference workloads (e.g., L40S configurations) often run on cheaper, lower-power hardware compared to training clusters (e.g., H100/B200). Because cloud providers do not always price these lower-tier instances at the same aggressive premiums as their flagship AI supercomputers, the arbitrage opportunity is smaller. Consequently, while a high-utilization training cluster might break even in 10 months, an inference node may require 14–18 months of continuous uptime to justify the capital expenditure..
Why is the "Utilization Threshold" a critical metric for CXOs? arrow faq
The decision to repatriate workloads from the cloud relies entirely on utilization. On-premise infrastructure is a fixed cost; it incurs expense whether it is processing tokens or idling. Our "Utilization Threshold" metric calculates the exact daily uptime required to beat cloud pricing. If your workload is sporadic (e.g., <4 hours/day), the flexibility of the cloud remains superior. If your models run continuously (>12 hours/day), owning the silicon provides a mathematical advantage..
Can I use these tools to justify a hybrid-cloud strategy? arrow faq
Yes, but with care. Using the toool requires precise workload segmentation. Use our calculator to identify your "base load": the steady-state inference or fine-tuning tasks that run 24/7—and anchor those on-premise for maximum TCO efficiency. Our tools help you define the specific "tipping point" (in hours per day) where a workload should graduate from a flexible cloud instance to a dedicated internal node.
Does the calculator account for regional power cost differences? arrow faq
urrently, the tool uses a standardized US Commercial Average to provide a consistent baseline. However, we recognize that power costs are highly regional.For a precise analysis, adjustments owuld be needed.

Solutions